Posts tagged politics
The Infanticide Battlefield; the Real Agenda & History Behind Abortion
Jun 1st
Do you know why abortion really began? Not many people do. Many today believe it is a ‘’political issue.” It is not. Many believe abortion enablers such as Planned Parenthood are simply there to ensure abortions are less prevalent, although they execute over 350,000 babies a year.
Abortion has been spun into something that is completely separate from what the politicians have made it. A lot of people argue that abortion should not be an issue that the government has its’ hands in. I agree because it’s not a political issue. It is an ideological issue. And until the nation understands the beginnings of why abortion came about, it will always be considered fifth on the list of ‘’important issues facing America.” There is no difference between what took place in Nazi death camps and what takes place behind the walls of a Planned Parenthood, it is rooted in the same evil ideology with an agenda that has no (R) or (D) behind its’ name.
Margaret Sanger opened the first birth control clinic in the United States in 1916. She coined the term ‘’birth control’’ after many of her own self-induced abortions. She paved the way for the legalization of birth control under the US Supreme Court’s decision of Griswold v. Connecticut on June 7, 1965. In 1921 she founded the ABCL (American Birth Control League) which later became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
What a lot of people don’t know is that Sanger was heavily immersed in eugenics. Eugenicists proudly espouse racial supremacy and believe in the eradication of any race and/or genetic disability that would hinder a perfect society. Eugenicists typically found anything other than the Aryan race was unfit. Sound familiar? Her ideology was rooted in Malthusian Eugenics. Thomas Robert Malthus was a professor of political economics and strongly believed that economic problems such as poverty and hunger were a result of overpopulation. The only way to take care of overpopulation is to exterminate those who were poor, racially inferior or physically debilitated. (Remember that in America, nine out of ten children who are diagnosed in the womb with Down’s syndrome are aborted. Doctors continue to recommend that mothers terminate their pregnancy if they are carrying a child with any disability that could “hinder” her way of life.) Malthus wrote in his 1798 An Essay on the Principle of Population; “all children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desire level, must necessarily perish, unless room is made for them by the deaths of grown persons.”

Let us not forget the same ideology that is eugenics, is what led Hitler to murder six million innocent Jews
Sanger was heavily influenced by Malthus and used Malthus’ eugenics ideology as the basis for the ABCL (today’s Planned Parenthood). Almost all of Sanger’s board members were eugenicists. The majority of financing was derived from big money eugenicists. The ABCL’s original work was actually housed in the offices of the Eugenics Society. Malthus and Sanger believed that charity actually propelled what they called ‘’human waste’’ on society because it enabled overpopulation instead of eradicating the ‘’problem.” In Sanger’s publication The Birth Control Review, she wrote, “…the most serious charge that can be brought against modern benevolence is that it encourages the perpetuation of defectives, delinquents, and dependents. These are the most dangerous elements in the world community, the most devastating curse on human progress and expression.”
Not only is Malthusian Eugenics goal to eliminate human beings considered “defective,” “delinquent” or “dependent,” it is rooted in racism. Remember, one of the pillars of eugenics is: racial inferiority, typically those not Aryan-like. The ABCL became a legal entity in 1929. This was the dawn of the Great Depression and racism against blacks was rampant thus creating more difficulty for them to find jobs and become productive members of society. Remember eugenics targets those races considered to hinder the well-being of a society that has negative economic repercussions. So how ironic that Sanger opened her first ‘clinic’ in a predominantly black populated city of Harlem, New York. Sanger’s goal was to diminish pro-creation of blacks. This is when Sanger began pushing birth control in the black community as an ‘’answer” to the problems they were facing during this time. All the while Sanger had a very deceptive objective. Sanger convinced many leaders in the black community, including pastors and the founder of the NAACP Dr. W.E. Burghardt DuBois that birth control would contribute to ‘’better health.” Gee, where have we heard that one lately? Blacks were facing problems such as: poverty, diseases and unemployment. How was birth control going to fix this? It wasn’t. Sanger knew if she could come at it from the ‘’healthcare’’ standpoint (as Planned Parenthood does today) she could implement her eugenics deceptively. Sanger then took her next clinic to the South…

Barack Obama's Science Czar John Holdren is a eugenics advocate. He co-authored a book in 1977 which advocated forced-abortions & sterilization
Questions began to arise within churches regarding the religious aspect of using birth control. Sanger began using words like “reproductive health,” “reproductive practices of black Americans” to err on the side of doing this for the well-being of the black community. Sounds familiar doesn’t it to Planned Parenthood’s “women’s reproductive rights” mantra? Sanger understood the role religion played in the South and was fearful religious leaders would speak out against birth control. As a result, Sanger pushed to have Minister’s placed in leadership roles. In a letter she wrote to her regional director, Dr. Clarence J. Gamble, Sanger said, “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” She later stated to the National Negro Advisory Council that, “the need for birth control is a public health measure.” Sound familiar again?
The 1939 Negro Project was to show the birth control ads to the health and well-being of the black community when the truth is all it did was serve as a backdoor Sanger and the eugenicists used to implement their evil schemes to diminish a particular race. In a letter responding to a report that indicated the lives of blacks didn’t improve from birth control, Dr. Dorothy Ferebee said, “The future program of Planned Parenthood should center around more education in the field through the work of a professional Negro worker, because those of us who believe that the benefits of Planned Parenthood as a vital key to the elimination of human waste much reach the entire population.” Since 1973 (Roe vs. Wade) thirteen million black babieshave been aborted and continue to be the majority of babies aborted in America as Planned Parenthood targets inner cities and predominantly black communities.
There are copious amounts of evidence that shows the true roots of abortion and the hateful ideology of those who fight to keep abortion legal. We see the same deceptive, flowery language used then by Margaret Sanger and Thomas Robert Malthus used today to fool the masses into believing abortion is a health care right. Don’t be fooled. This is an issue beyond politics; this is a battle of good vs. evil.
The world was adamant to stop a mad man who blatantly called for the extermination of a particular race because they were not ‘’fit’’ for society. Six million innocent victims later, the world did something about it. Now children are being killed legally in America because they have a disability, they are the wrong race or the wrong sex. The very same eugenic-driven, evil ideology that Hitler and Sanger adhered to is being implemented on our nation’s most vulnerable, and we continue to enable it. Why is it that now, over 60 million innocent victims later (and that’s solely in America) have been slaughtered and nothing is being done about it? We have gone from the Nazi death camps to the confines of a Planned Parenthood. If Hitler would have been able to murder the Jewish people inside the confines of a Planned Parenthood, would it be considered okay because it was Hitler’s “choice?”
Occupy Election 2012: It’s “We the People” not “We the Media”
Mar 7th
I don’t remember an election where a candidate didn’t even have half the delegates needed to actually win the nomination and the American people were constantly told to simply “come together” or to just concede and ‘’get behind’’ that person. The media and the majority of the establishment have truly exemplified the left’s mentality of one not having to actually earn something but rather it just be given to them.
It’s as if the media has taken over with Occupy Election 2012. News alert to mainstream: There are a lot more than one per center’s out here in this matter and we are not going to compromise nor concede to the candidate you are pushing upon us. We aren’t going to drop those red, white and blue balloons yet regardless of the fact you’re already inflating them. It’s we the people, not we the media.
Not even half of the states in this Republic have gone to the polls to elect the man who will stand up against the train wreck who has been steering us on the Socialism Express for the last three years. But yet, every day we are told that one particular candidate is the ‘’inevitable’’ nominee and that he is the ‘’only one who can beat Obama.” I have always said, whoever the media subtly endorses, or in this case blatantly endorses in a Republican nomination process, the voters need to flee in the opposite direction. Am I saying all media is doing this? No. However the big networks, newspapers, talking heads, paid political pundits and so-called non-establishment columnists are.
Not only have the American people experienced how pushy the establishment can be, we have also seen how they are able to pick the political topic for the week (or months), falsely spin it and then blame a particular candidate for not talking about the ‘’important issues.” Prime example is what they did to Senator Santorum. The fact is that ABC’s George Stephanopoulos was the man responsible for bringing up contraception in one of the first Presidential debates. Unfortunately they were successful in their attempt to trap the candidates in their media net and the birth control issue became more like the catch of the next three months instead of the catch of the day. We need to remain a few strokes ahead of them and not let something as ridiculous as reproduction and birth control dictate our discussion. Speaking of producing, I’m still waiting for someone to produce the tape where Senator Santorum said he is going to take away a woman’s birth control. ..
Last night while watching the returns from Ohio, Tennessee, Oklahoma and the other Super Tuesday states, CNN did a hypothetical delegate map where they played around with numbers and states regarding the candidate’s potential wins. I wouldn’t mind hypothetical maps if they actually did hypothetical’s that were possible for all candidates. It was as if they gave John King only one Crayola to use, Romney Red. 
I know from experience this election after speaking with hundreds of voters the lines of truth and complacency are merging. This is far from over. We need to remember that we live in a Republic and all of us are to be represented. That means we each get a say and that it’s our duty to educate ourselves on the issues and not simply take what a Super PAC ad says or a paid panel of pundits. We are capable of thinking for ourselves. Whenever we are rushed into something, it should serve as a bright yellow yield sign. Usually when someone rushes us to do something they are hiding something or they know that the passing of time will be disadvantageous to them. Just like when Nancy Pelosi said ‘’we must pass the healthcare bill in order to see what’s in it.”
The establishment is trying to rush us into picking a candidate, a particular candidate. It’s in these moments we must refuse compromise and we must take the longest pause. In the end yes, Republicans will back our nominee. We want Barack Obama on flight #2013 back to Chicago, golf clubs and all. What I am saying is that this time hopefully it won’t be as it was in 2008; when the majority of us had to close our eyes and clench our jaw while pulling the lever for our Republican nominee.


